Typescript Async Function Return Type Void Vs Promise

Table of Contents

Toggle

Introduction

In comparing Typescript async function return type void with Promise, the key is understanding that an async function specifically returns a Promise, while void assures no return value or undefined. Essentially, Promise indicates an asynchronous operation that doesn’t yield a valuable result, whereas ‘void’ signifies the absence of any return from a function. It’s critical in TypeScript applications to identify your need for data retrieval through promises or when no significant information is being returned.

Quick Summary

In TypeScript, when it comes to asynchronous functions, two commonly used return types are `void` and `Promise`.

Void

void

void

void

Promise<void>

Promise

Promise<void>

Promise<void>

To illustrate these concepts, let’s look at two examples:

1. Async function with `void`:
ts
async function alertUser(): void {
await alert(‘Hello, user!’);
}

In this example, the asynchronous function `alertUser()` uses the `void` return type, declaring that it won’t be returning any meaningful value.

2. Async function with `Promise`:
ts
function delayedAlert(): Promise {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(() => {
alert(‘This is a delayed alert!’);
resolve();
}, 3000);
});
}

Here, the function `delayedAlert()` returns a `Promise` because it executes an asynchronous operation (a timeout), but does not specifically return any significant value.

Choosing between `void` and `Promise` as return types is largely dependent on the purpose of your asynchronous function. Both signify that no considerable result is returned, but usage of `Promise` emphasizes the promise-based nature of async tasks.

As famously said by Jeff Atwood, co-founder of Stack Overflow and Discourse: “Any application that can be written in JavaScript, will eventually be written in JavaScript.” Although mentioning JavaScript, it definitely showcases the importance of understanding nuances like function return types also in TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript, to ensure we are writing efficient and readable code.

Understanding Async Functions in TypeScript

When defining an async function in TypeScript, your focus is often on handling Promises more comfortably. You can declare an async function by putting the ‘async’ keyword before a function name. The asynchronous function always returns a Promise, even if you don’t consciously return one from the function body. Now, let’s consider the differences between

void

and

Promise

as return types for these asynchronous functions.

1) Async Functions with Return Type Void:

When an async function is designed to return ‘void’, it means the Promise doesn’t provide any meaningful value when resolved.

Consider this example:

    async function fetchData(): void {
        const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
        console.log(await response.json());
    }

Here, the function ‘fetchData’ retrieves some data using the ‘fetch’ API, logs the returned data to the console but doesn’t return any value.

2) Async Functions with Return Type Promise <Void> :

A function that returns Promise also implies that the resulting Promise does not give any substantial result, akin to an async function returning ‘void’. However, there is a subtle difference: a function with return type ‘Promise‘ explicitly informs that the function is expected to return a Promise that we don’t care to process once resolved.

Consider this slightly modified example of our previous ‘fetchData’ function:

    async function fetchData(): Promise<void> {
        const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
        console.log(await response.json());
    }

Once again, ‘fetchData’ doesn’t return any value. However, the declaration now clearly shows that ‘fetchData’ is designed to return a Promise.

So, depending upon your coding style or requirements of your TypeScript project, you can use either ‘void’ or ‘Promise‘ as a return type for async functions doing some processing but not responsible for returning a sensible value. As cleverly put by Robert C. Martin, one of the authors of Agile Manifesto, “Clean code always looks like it was written by someone who cared”, this lesson applies here too. Your careful selection between ‘void’ and ‘Promise‘ could render your code cleaner and more clear to other developers on your project.

For an extended understanding of working with asynchronous processes in TypeScript, read more on the official TypeScript documentation page.

Examining the Return Type Void in TypeScript

`. These two types are distinct from each other. While they may seem similar on the surface, they have differing implications in regards to how they alter the functioning & structure of code.

When we talk about the `void` type in TypeScript:

– Void is generally said to signify ‘no value’ or ‘non-existence of anything’.
– It indicates that a function does not return a value.
– In Typescript, when void is used as the return type of a function, it suggests that the function doesn’t return any usable value.

Let’s look at a simple example:
typescript
function greet(name: string) : void {
console.log(`Hello, ${name}!`);
}

Here, the ‘greet’ function does not return anything, hence the type is void.

In contrast, when dealing with async functions, the type returned is implicitly set to `Promise` even if ’void’ is explicitly stated.

– The main distinction between `void` and `Promise` lies in their handling of async operations.
– A Promise is essentially an object that represents the eventual completion or failure of an asynchronous operation.

For an asynchronous function which does not return anything, you could use `Promise`, as shown in the following TypeScript snippet:

typescript
async function greetAsync(name: string): Promise {
// simulated delay
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 500));

console.log(`Hello, ${name}!`);
}

It’s essential to note that while the async keyword makes a function return a Promise implicitly, the void return type isn’t truly “void” since it implies a Promise.

As Larry Tesler, renowned computer scientist once stated, “Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.” This perfectly encapsulates the difference between `void` and `Promise` – a simple approach for simpler scenarios, and a more evolved pattern for handling complex, asynchronous tasks.

Understanding the nuances between these two types can be crucial in creating clean, maintainable code. If you’re writing an asynchronous function that isn’t expected to return a value, using `Promise` as the return type is a great way to signal to other developers that they should expect promise-based behavior.

For learning more about TypeScript types or Async/Promise patterns, TypeScript Handbook would be an excellent resource to start with.

The Role of Promise in Asynchronous Functions

In TypeScript, the role of `Promise` offers a unique contract in asynchrony. When it comes to asynchronous functions in TypeScript, leveraging `Promise` as the return type ensures consistent behavior and error handling while working with asynchronous code.

Firstly, understanding what Promise represents is crucial. The Void signifies that a promise doesn’t resolve with any value. Think of this as a function that returns nothing in synchronous programming: it only performs an action but does not give back any result.

For instance, consider the following TypeScript async function:

async function exampleFunc(): Promise<Void> {
  // perform some asynchronous operations
}

Here, `exampleFunc` doesn’t explicitly return a value – what it promises is that it will eventually complete. This is particularly useful when it’s the side effects of the operation you’re interested in, rather than any returned value.

Comparing `void` vs `Promise`, you’ll see the asynchronous programming model becomes evident. Declaring a TypeScript async function with a return type `void` is misleading. Despite the syntax being entirely valid – at runtime, if checked, the actual return type would be `Promise`.

async function anotherExampleFunc(): void {
  // perform some asynchronous operations
}

The function `anotherExampleFunc` automatically wraps its outcome into a `Promise`. Ignoring the `Promise` in the return signature might lead to unexpected results, especially when orchestrating complex asynchronous flows or catching exceptions properly.

The correctness of handling these asynchronous operations can’t be understated. As Tony Hoare, the inventor of the null reference once said, “I call it my billion-dollar mistake…At that time, I was designing the first comprehensive type system for references in an object-oriented language. My goal was to ensure that all use of references should be absolutely safe, with checking performed automatically by the compiler.”

The ‘automatic checking’ Hoare mentions is an important element, and `Promise` helps us achieve that. By explicitly declaring the `Promise` part in `Promise`, it provides a clear indication of the function’s nature, enhances readability, encourages better error handling, and promotes async/await syntactic sugar. Thus, from TypeScript’s static typing perspective, explicitly marking as `Promise` yields more foolproof type-safe code.

For developers intent on avoiding common pitfalls associated with asynchronous operations in TypeScript, adhering to this practice can make a significant difference. Adopting explicit promises in function signatures not only leads to clean, readable code but ensures peace of mind when applications scale and grow complex.

References:

1. [TypeScript Promise](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-1-7.html#async-functions)

2. [Tony Hoare – Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake](https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Null-References-The-Billion-Dollar-Mistake-Tony-Hoare/)

Comparing and Contrasting: Void Vs. Promise In TypeScript

The comparison and contrast of different return types, specifically ‘void’ and ‘Promise‘, becomes significant while working on asynchronous functions in TypeScript. These two seemingly similar constructs can often result in different outcomes that could affect the overall application behavior you’re developing.

Emphasizing first on ‘void’ type, it is generally associated with a function that does not return a value. The underlying idea while using ‘void’ as a return type is to convey that the primary concern is the side effects of executing the function rather than the yield of it.

On the other hand, ‘Promise‘ is typically observed in context of asynchronous operations.

An Example:
Consider an async function that doesn’t return anything. It might look something like this:

async function exampleFunction(): Promise {
    // Your performative code here
}

In this code snippet, the function ‘exampleFunction’ is denoted as an async function, which returns ‘Promise‘. The reason here is that even though the function itself doesn’t explicitly return a result, it implicitly returns a promise that resolves when the function’s work is complete due to being labeled as an async function. This promise won’t carry any data—it won’t wrap a specific return value. Thus, the most accurate way to annotate it is with ‘Promise‘.

Contrasting this with a void return type,

function exampleFunction2(): void{
    // Your performative code here
}

Here, ‘exampleFunction2’ plainly executes some code without returning anything (no explicit value or promise).

Why Is This Important?
The difference between ‘void’ and ‘Promise‘ primarily shines through when working around error handling mechanisms:

• With ‘Promise‘, you can catch any unhandled exceptions within the async function using .catch() or equivalent methods.
• However, with ‘void’, error handling requires explicit code within the function body to manage possible errors or exceptions.

“Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” – Martin Fowler
Final Thoughts
As TypeScript provides strict typing, understanding these nuances between ‘void’ and ‘Promise‘ return type should be an inherent part of your coding acumen. It becomes less about personal preference, and more about writing robust, understandable, and correctly typed code. Inspecting asynchronous functions appropriately and applying the right sort of return type can profoundly impact codebase quality in the longer run.

Source:
TypeScript Handbook – Functions

Conclusion

Understanding the distinction between the return types “void” and “Promise” in a TypeScript async function is vital for knowing how best to design asynchronous operations in your code.

Referencing

void

as a return type means that a function, whether synchronous or asynchronous, isn’t expected to return a value at all. It essentially tell TypeScript developers that they should not use or expect a returned value from this function.

The usage would look like this:

async function demoFunction(): void {
  await action();
}

However, when you employ

Promise

as your async function’s return type, it specifies the same absence of a concrete return value but adds a promise interface that resolves without returning data. In essence, it acknowledges the Promise-based nature of async operations (returning a Promise) while also stipulating that this Promise doesn’t resolve with any useful data.

This could look like:

async function demoFunction(): Promise {
  await action();
}

Using

Promise

over

void

offers a clear hint in terms of expectations to other TypeScript developers who may call your async functions. It tells them they can ‘await’ the function and also makes the function then-able. Therefore, if there’s a need to indicate an async function won’t provide meaningful output data,

Promise

is especially useful within the context of chained promises and inside async/await syntax structures.

As Martin Fowler expressed, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” The choice between using

void

and

Promise<void>

comes down to clarity and readability for your fellow developers.

TypeScript Documentation

Related

• Line 0: Parsing Error: Cannot Read Property Map Of Undefined
• Nextrouter Was Not Mounted Next.Js